network economics - the most dangerous games people ever play 100-lose or 100-win

If humanity is to exit the 2010s with sustainability exponentials rising, then it would be best to start the 2010s with all due modesty. Currently the mosquito is smarter at networking than mah - if it weren't mlaaria as a killer disease would be over by 2015 as Obama committed to during his electioneering.

Networking Economics is a 100-lose or 100-win game and through the 2000s we saw serial evidence of how powerful leaders and debt-conditioned citizens can interact in spinning 100-lose games:

meltdown of dotcom in connecting communities round bricks and clicks
the control of wars by speculators who profited most from oil and arms
wall street's childish self-destruction over housing bubbles and paying for its own junk ratings

Is there a reason to be optimistic? Can generation 2010 1 2 help save the world from ever more networking crashes?

Yes the reason to be optimistic is role played by Muhammad Yunus http://yunusworld.com and all alumni of his new global collaboration partnering games in sustainability around such wishes as:

7 wishes

End Poverty & Global Systems that Crash , Trap or Externalise

End carbon in our waters, air, food and machine's energies

End hunger, and broken distribution channels

End premature death and ever higher cost of health; end abuse of safety of any demographic

End wars and govs that spend 20% of the peoples on arms or corruption

End borders as barriers to communities/webs of people mobilising productivity and core knowhow

End school-less children and universities without job creating microentrepreneurs